An Essay on the Bonifacio-Aguinaldo Schism as Manifestation of National Disunity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70922/965txh57Keywords:
Bonifacio, nation, nationhood, Aguinaldo, Philippine Revolution, Philippine StudiesAbstract
This essay conducts an analysis of the underlying factors contributing to the
ideological and strategic disagreement between Emilio Aguinaldo and Andres
Bonifacio during the Philippine Revolution. Employing a multi-dimensional approach, the essay scrutinizes the distinct objectives each leader had for the revolution, highlighting the complexities of their conflicting perspectives. Likewise it evaluates the substantive impact of the Aguinaldo-Bonifacio schism on what was otherwise considered a unified revolutionary movement, thereby presenting implications for the interpretation of historical revolutions.
Downloads
References
Ancheta, C. (1971). One Hundred Revolts Against Spain (Paper read). 5th Conference on Asian History by the International Association of Historians of Asia.
Constantino, R. (1975). The Philippines: A past revisited. Manila, Philippines.
DeViana, A. (2014). Si Manong Andres: Stories about Andres Bonifacio De Castro. Historical Bulletin, XLVIII, 12-33.
Kalaw, M. (1926). The development of Philippine politics (1872-1920). Philippine Political Science Series, Vol. 1. Oriental Commercial Co., Inc.: Manila.
Karnow, S. (1989). In our image: America’s empire in the Philippines. Random House.
Kendall, D., Murray, J. L., & Linden, R. (2004). Sociology in our times (3rd ed.). Nelson Education Ltd., 190.
Mateo, G. (2003). Ethnicity and the creation of national identity. Office of Multicultural Student Services, University of Hawaii. Retrieved October 7, 2007, from www.opmanoa.ssc.hawaii.edu
Mabini, A. (1969). The Philippine Revolution. (L.M. Guerrero Trans.). National Historical Commission.
May, G. (2007). Warfare by Pulong: Bonifacio, Aguinaldo, and the Philippine Revolution against Spain. Philippine Studies, 55(4), 449-447.
McCoy, A. (2001). The colonial origins of Philippine military traditions. In F. Rodao & F. N. Rodriquez (Eds.), The Philippine Revolution of 1896: Ordinary lives in extraordinary times (pp. 83-124). Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Robles, E. (n.d.). Manuel L. Quezon, Messages of the President, Vol. 2, Part I (pp. 26-27). Cited in E. Robles, The Philippines in the Nineteenth Century. Malaya Books.
Saulo, A. (1987). The truth about Aguinaldo and other heroes. Phoenix Publishing House: Quezon City.
Schumacker, J. (1976). The religious character of the revolution in Cavite, 1896-1897. Philippine Studies, 24, 399-416.
U.S. Senate Document. (1902). As cited in A. Saulo’s The truth about Aguinaldo and other heroes. Viray, J.R.B. (2014). The case of Kapampangan Supremo: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. PUP Monograph Series 2014. Polytechnic University of the Philippines.
Weber, M. (n.d.). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Retrieved November 20, 2012. http://marxists.org/reference/archive/weber/protestant-ethic/ch05.htm