Symbols and Archetypes: A Formalist and Archetypal Analysis of Peter Solis Nery’s Three Hiligaynon Short Stories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70922/t55vj346Keywords:
archetypes, formalism, Hiligaynon short stories, Peter Solis Nery, symbolismAbstract
Philippine regional literature, specifically Hiligaynon, encompasses a multifold of genres that reflect the region’s culture and literary excellence. Authors in the language excel in the craft of putting narrative and other elements together to create stories that provide insights into the lives and values of the Hiligaynon community. This study aims to contribute to the visibility of regional literature in academic research by exploring Hiligaynon literature through the works of Peter Solis Nery, particularly in the aspect of symbolism. Employing a Qualitative Textual Analysis design, this study sought to find (1) the symbolisms in the short stories Lirio, Donato Bugtot, and Si Padre Olan kag ang Dios, and (2) how the symbols align with or diverge from universal archetypes. Using I.A. Richard’s Formalism, the study examined the symbolisms in the three short stories to uncover layers of representations and meanings. Guided by Carl Jung’s Archetypal Theory, the symbols were then compared to collective mental constructs that have resonated among individuals for thousands of years. The findings show that the symbols play important roles in the stories, serving as vessels through which the characters’ struggles, experiences, and faith are illustrated, illuminating the truths often unspoken within Filipino society, such as abuse, social rejection, and the struggle of faith. Among the eighteen symbols, fifteen were found to align with universal archetypes, highlighting the universality of Hiligaynon literature. Meanwhile, the three symbols, specifically the lily flower, Donato’s hump and kidney, hold distinct meanings in the narratives, showing the contextual nature of symbolism.
Downloads
References
Altheide, D. L., & Schneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative Media analysis. Altheide, D. L., & Schneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative Media analysis. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452270043
Andreotti, M., Caruso, G., Massari, L., & Riva, M. A. (2017). Spinal deformities in romantic operas. Spine, 43(22), 1617–1618. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002399
Baert, B. (2016). Die spätmittelalterlichen eingefassten Gärten oder horti conclusi in den Niederlanden. Zeitschrift Für Medien- Und Kulturforschung, 7(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.28937/1000106453
Berezhna, M. (2022). THE MAIDEN PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ARCHETYPE (MARVEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE). International Humanitarian University Herald Philology, 58, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2022.58.6
Berezhna, M. V. (2022). The nurturer Psycholinguistic Archetype: LIWC-22 ANALYSIS. PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND TRANSLATION STUDIES: EUROPEAN POTENTIAL, 115–118. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26- 261-6-27
Callaghan, F. (n.d.). What Is the Everyman Archetype? Definition and Examples. Scribophile. Retrieved March 10, 2025, from https://www.scribophile.com/academy/what-is-the-everyman-archetype
Chetwynd, T. (1993). Dictionary of Symbols (Vol. 2). The Aquarian Press. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofsymb0000chet/page/n5/mode/1up
Chevalier, J., & Gheerbrant, A. (1996). A Dictionary of Symbols. Penguin Group. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofsymb00chev/page/n4/mode/1up
Cirlot, J. E. (2001). A Dictionary of Symbols (J. Sage, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://archive.org/details/dictionary-of-symbols- 1990/page/n4/mode/1up
Colin, D. (2000). Dictionary of Symbols, Myths, and Legends. Hachette Livre (Hachette Pratique). https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofsymb0000coli/page/n5/mode/1up
Dhivya, A. C. A., A, P., Mathanavalli, S., Rp, M., & S, S. (2024). Neo-humanism and the Modern World: A Philosophical Perspective through the Lens of Philip Roth’s Everyman. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p383
Dimo, J. (2022). Selected Hiligaynon Short Stories: Anthology of Translations. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(3), 1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7446750
Eknoyan, G. (2012). The Early Modern Kidney—Nephrology in and about the Nineteenth Century (Part 1). Seminars in Dialysis, 26(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12038
Ferber, M. (1999). A Dictionary of Literary Symbols. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryoflite0000ferb_w8w9/page/n7/mode/1up
Haviv, Y. S. (1999). Figures in the Historical Dispute over Renal Function. Part I: From Ancient Times to the First Microscopes. Journal of Medical Biography, 7(4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/096777209900700406
Jeffrey, S. (2026, January 13). The Ultimate list of archetypes (350+ examples). CEOsage. https://scottjeffrey.com/archetypes-list/
Jobes, G. (1961). Dictionary of Mythology, Folklore and Symbols. The Scarecrow Press, Inc. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofmyth0001jobe/page/n6/mode/1up
Julien, N. (1996). The Mammoth Dictionary of Symbols: Understanding the Hidden Language of Symbols. Robinson Publishing. https://archive.org/details/mammothdictionar00juli/page/n5/mode/1up
Jung, C. G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (H. Read, M. Fordham, & G. Adler, Eds.; R. F. G. Hull, Trans.; Vol. 9). Bollingen Foundation Inc.https://ia801406.us.archive.org/9/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.185498/2015.185 498.The-Archetypes-And-Collective-Unconscious_text.pdf
Jung, C. G. (2014). Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 9 (Part 1): Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. In Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850969
Khanal, U. (2024). Butterflies’ myth and cultural beliefs on the origin of Nawa Durga goddesses in West Nepal. The Creative Launcher, 9(5), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2024.9.5.09
Kopple, J. D. (1994). The Biblical view of the kidney. American Journal of Nephrology, 14(4–6), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1159/000168735
Kumar, Dr. R. (2020). Symbolism in the poetry of Nissim Ezekiel. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7(10), 1211–1215. https://www.jetir.org/view?paper=JETIR2010152
Lupascu, L. (2025). The letter-object with semiotic values. Univers Pedagogic, 87(3), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.52387/1811-5470.2025.3.16
Maio, G. (1999). The metaphorical and mythical use of the kidney in antiquity. American Journal of Nephrology, 19(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1159/000013434
Mark, M., & Pearson, C. (2001). The Hero and The Outlaw: Building Extraordinary Brands Through the Power Archetypes. McGraw-Hill. https://archive.org/details/herooutlaw0000unse/page/n6/mode/1up
Michniewska, M. (2021). Rośliny na średniowiecznych obrazach Zwiastowania Najświętszej Marii Panny z XIV, XV i początku XVI w. Wiadomości Botaniczne, 64. https://doi.org/10.5586/wb.642
Mojares, R. B. (2023). Bisayan studies. South East Asia Research, 31(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828x.2023.2259164
Moore, A. (2009). Recovering difference in the Deleuzian dichotomy of Masochism- Without-Sadism. Angelaki, 14(3), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250903407500
Nery, P. S. (2014a, July 11). Donato Bugtot. Peter Solis Nery. Retrieved February 15, 2025, from https://petersolisnery.com/donato-bugtot/
Nery, P. S. (2014b, July 11). Si Padre Olan kag ang Dios. Peter Solis Nery. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from https://petersolisnery.com/si-padre-olan-kag-ang- dyos/
Nery, P. S. (2014c, July 14). Lirio. Peter Solis Nery. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from https://petersolisnery.com/lirio/
Ruszkowski, M. (2022). Liczba trzy w kulturze i języku. ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS PAEDAGOGICAE CRACOVIENSIS STUDIA LINGUISTICA, 17, 214–221. https://doi.org/10.24917/20831765.17.16
Simbolon, L., Matondang, S. A., & Manugeren, M. (2025). A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON CULTURAL IDENTITY AND LOCAL WISDOM IN INDONESIAN LITERARY CRITICISM AND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 9(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.31851/gesjg041
Trentin, L. (2015). The Hunchback in Hellenistic and Roman Art (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555816
Tresidder, J. (2002). The Complete Dictionary of Symbols. Duncan Baird Publishers. https://archive.org/details/completedictiona00jack/page/n5/mode/1up
Tribunal-Nemenzo, R. (2023). Stylistic Analysis on Selected Literary works of Alicia Tan-Gonzales. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 5(1), 44– 52. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.5.1.7
Villanueva, J. F. R., & Mendoza, R. C. (2021). Signs and Meanings in Hiligaynon Contemporary Stories. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.63.25
Vries, A. D. (1974). Dictionary of Symbols and Imagery. North-Holland Publishing Company. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofsymb0000vrie/page/n6/mode/1up
Zou, J. (2023). Porównanie symboliki wierzby i lilii w chińskiej i polskiej kulturze na tle teorii językowego obrazu świata. Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, 23, 84– 103. https://doi.org/10.4467/23538724gs.23.005.18151
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Atasha Rose Salva, Pearl Joy Materbonia, Ma. Rebecca Canono, Alyka Marie Guanzon, John Jonathan Normandia (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the SOCIAL SCIENCES AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW will be Open-Access articles distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This allows for immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose.